In case you didn't notice, Openbravo does not have an entry in the English edition of the Wikipedia, the fine community driven encyclopedia.
For some reason, the word Openbravo has been "blacklisted" and any attempt to create an entry about Openbravo gets automatically deleted.
The Wikipedia relies on a complex set of rules and policies which are enforced by the voluntary editors who are responsible for the quality of the site. Thanks to them, the Wikipedia remains an objective and dependable source of information. However, the "politics" in the application of these rules are, in many occasions, difficult to understand to an outsider. At least, this is my case.
I have opened a thread of discussion about the inclusion of Openbravo at
the talk page of a comparison of accounting software article. I have also requested it at the technology's requested articles page.
I would like to request the help of those of you knowledgeable about the inner workings of Wikipedia's community. If you believe Openbravo deserves an entry in the Wikipedia, can you show your favorable opinion in that threat? Can you help getting Openbravo out of the blacklist?
I know this is an argument Wikipedia editors accept, but I cannot understand why other fellow open source project are there and we are banned?
Sigh!
Thursday, November 8, 2007
Does Openbravo deserve to be on the Wikipedia?
Posted by Josep Mitjà at 1:05 AM
Labels: community
sb_post_date = "Thursday, November 8, 2007";
sb_categories = "community";
sb_url_to_rate = "http://redzezen.blogspot.com/2007/11/does-openbravo-deserve-to-be-on.html";
sb_rated_title = "Does Openbravo deserve to be on the Wikipedia?";
sb_when_to_load = "immediate";
try { var sb_dp = Date.parse(sb_post_date + ' ' + "1:05 AM"); sb_rated_creation = isNaN(sb_dp)? new Date() : new Date(sb_dp); } catch (e) { sb_rated_creation = new Date(); }
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
Hey fellow,
we have got a similar porblem with Bitweaver (bitweaver.org). Wikipedia goes to hell...
Post a Comment